🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has stated to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to release them publicly.

Possible Boost for AI Training

Observers said the apparent data breach could aid AI companies looking for material to develop their technology.

An entity known as Anna’s Archive said it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and album names. The company, which hosts more than 100 million tracks, stated that the breach did not constitute its full inventory.

“We have identified and disabled the nefarious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” stated a company spokesperson.

The Stockholm-based service, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a third party scraped public metadata and employed questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for offering links to copyright-infringing books, said in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group claimed the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘peer-to-peer networks’, a means of exchanging large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” said Anna’s Archive, which frames its mission as “preserving humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

Model Development and Intellectual Property Debate

Ed Newton-Rex for defending artists’ rights, remarked the breached music would likely be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on pirated material is unfortunately widespread in the tech sector, so this accessed music is almost certain to be used training AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a huge online archive of copyrighted books that has reportedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on the professional network that members of the public could in principle “build their own personal free version of the service”. The executive said it could also allow technology firms to “train on modern music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has emerged as a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

In the UK, creative professionals have raised concerns against a government proposal to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the proposal has backed artists’ concerns.

A government minister for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this correct”. The government has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by March 2025.